On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:06, Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com> wrote:
> I've got the patch to Safe ready but the more I think about it the more
> I think the right fix is for Safe to automatically fully load utf8.pm
> (and utf8_heavy.pl) and to always share SWASHNEW itself.
It seems cleaner if we could just share say utf8::VERSION. SWASHNEW
seems likely to be changed as it "feels" more like a implementation
detail. But if thats what utf8 checks... well then thats what it
checks.
> Assuming perl5-porters agree then the next release of Safe will do that
> ad this patch won't be needed. (Other than it possibly being worthwhile
> to detect the 'bad' versions of Safe.)
It seems safer if there was some way to 'opt' in say if utf8 was
loaded then make safe do the above. Or maybe a pragma? use utf8
qw(utf8); We would still have to patch postgres... But I can
imagine there are some users of utf8 that dont want utf8 strings. BTW
as I could not reproduce this does this mean that reval->('"\x{}...")
works while reval->('sub { "\x{}"}') does not ? Or is it before the
first one failed while the closure based one worked?
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
