Justin Pitts <jpi...@bplglobal.net> writes:
> My guess is that I am not provoking a 'SI queue overrun' 

The 100 temp table creations probably will do that just fine.

> Am I completely off base about how this should be reproducing?

Two points: the session you hope to have crash *must* be in serializable
mode, and the crash would actually happen in the transaction after the
one that's rolled back.

The error doesn't have to be a serialization error, so in principle
you should be able to make it fail with something as simple as

        begin;
        select 1/0;
        rollback;
        select * from foo;

as long as the ROLLBACK is done with a prepared statement and you've
forced a SI overrun since the ROLLBACK was prepared.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to