On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is an > issue that other people have run into in the past, and I don't think > we have a good solution. I wonder if we should put some kind of a > limit in place so that queries like this will at least fail relatively > gracefully with an error message rather than taking down the box.
Eh? That's exactly what's supposed to happen now. When malloc returns 0 you're supposed to get a graceful error message and transaction abort. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
