Robert Haas escribió: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Hmm. Cute, but I wonder why we shouldn't just be throwing an error. > > As I said last night, the only thing I see wrong with the current > > behavior is that the error message isn't phrased in a way that makes > > it obvious it's the user's fault. > > I think the problem we're trying to solve is that the view works but > it isn't dumpable. So it would also be a solution that the ALTER TABLE that renamed the column throwed an error if there's a view that requires the name. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
