Sam Mason <s...@samason.me.uk> writes: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 05:49:25PM +0100, Sam Mason wrote: >> PG could maybe throw an error to tell you this is >> what is happening?
> Would something like the included patch be accepted? ISTM this was debated once before and rejected. However, there's a proposal over here http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg02073.php to tighten up what the "char" input functions will take, and maybe throwing error for excess input would fit in with that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
