"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote:
>> If I understand your question, you're comparing:
>>
>> (a) leaving a literal as "unknown" until you've finished
>> inferring types (current behavior)
>> (b) casting every unknown to text immediately, and then trying to
>> infer the types
> No, that's not it. I'm wondering why it isn't treated as text.
> Period. Full stop. Nothing to infer.
Because then we would have to provide implicit casts from text to
everything else, which would be horribly dangerous.
> In my view, it is wrong that any of those work. I would expect to
> have to code one of these:
> select now() < date '2009-01-01'; -- implicit casts should cover
> select now() < timestamp with time zone '2009-01-01 00:00:00.0';
[ shrug... ] The current design is a compromise between usability
and strictness of semantics. This proposal appears to be all strictness
and no usability. No thanks ... even without any backward-compatibility
considerations, I wouldn't find this to be an improvement.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
