On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:45, Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> This would amount to fairly major surgery for pg_standby on Win32. Is >> that something we'd want to backpatch, or do we want to backpatch just >> the removal of the signal() calls which would amount to not supporting >> signals in pg_standby on win32? > > I think we should just remove the signals support for win32. The trigger > file method still works, and the signal method has always been a bit > iffy (it doesn't work when pg_standby isn't running, for example, which > happens between processing of each WAL file, because there's no process > to signal).
Fair enough. > Is pg_standby killed correctly when postmaster dies? No idea. I can set up and env to test, but I don't have one ready. Anybody else have tried this? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
