I wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> Hmm, I see another small issue. We now keep track of the "minimum
>> recovery point". Whenever a data page is flushed, we set minimum
>> recovery point to the LSN of the page in XLogFlush(), instead of
>> fsyncing WAL like we do in normal operation.
> We would want the end-of-recovery checkpoint to act like it's not in
> recovery anymore for this purpose, no?
Actually, what in the world is the purpose of that code at all?
I can't see a case where it would trigger that wouldn't be a result
of data corruption rather than a real need to advance the min restart
point.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
