On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 19:20 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > >
> But we need to set LocalRecoveryInProgress appropriately > > also. > > Yeah, the trouble is to tell bgwriter that it's OK for it to create the > checkpoint, which includes writing a WAL record, while still keeping the > system "in-recovery" for all other purposes. While we could just relax > the checks, that seems like a very important safeguard. > > (I posted in the other mail to do a restartpoint before the startup > process does the checkpoint) I think we're in strong agreement, just thinking and writing emails in realtime gives a few race conditions... your patch covers everything I mentioned above. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
