Keith Pierno <kpie...@lulu.com> writes:
> The backup used was from well after the failover time which is why I
> was concerned. Interestingly enough the logs are still all prefixed
> with 00000004... That just makes this problem extremely bizarre.

Hmm, that *is* weird.  It seems like the new primary must have reverted
its decision to go from timeline 4 to timeline 6.  (Which in itself is
a bit odd; why not timeline 5?)

Can you give us an exact sequence of events on the slave server/new
primary around the time of the failover?  Also, what was in the .history
file when you found it, and are there any other history files?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to