Daniele Bortoluzzi <borto...@gmail.com> writes: >> Can you still reproduce this with CVS HEAD,
> with CVS HEAD the error is not occurring. Did you fix some GIN bug in > this version? Yes, I told you so. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-06/msg00081.php But I don't see how that bug would've led to a segfault. Bogus TIDs in the index should be caught without that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
