Mark <ad...@asarian-host.net> writes:
> Interesting. Yet, as I reported earlier, whilst a symlink does seem to start
> the server, pg_ctl takes a long time to do so, and then report: "could not
> start server" anyway. But it actually *does* get started. So I figured maybe
> something was not entirely right with the symlink, either.
That sounds like pg_ctl isn't finding the postmaster's socket file ...
were you playing games with the location of that, too? pg_ctl is not
terribly bright about relocated socket files (in particular, it does
not read the postmaster's postgresql.conf, so a nonstandard setting
there for unix_socket_directory will confuse it).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
