On Apr 26, 2:08 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Kevin Field <kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Apr 24, 9:32 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote: > > >> I don't know if there is any way we can solve it, except by reverting > >> back to 5.8 or advising users to use only one version. > > > I just had an idea--at least in the ActiveState distributions (not > > sure about Strawberry or Vanilla) they include versioned-filename > > binaries. So you can launch perl5.8.8.exe or perl5.10.0.exe and as > > long as it's in the path you get the exact right one. (As I found out > > when I went to try to figure out per-user paths, I somehow have both > > versions in the universal path.) Would that help? > > No, because we use the DLLs, not the .exe. But they do seem to be > versioned anyway, so there must be something else going on :-(
:( Well on my end, I haven't been able to figure out how to get it to see the right version. Do you know when the next beta or win32 installer build might be out so I can try again? -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
