Tom Lane wrote: > I am of the opinion that sslverify should have these values: > > off = never verify > on = verify if root.crt is present (default behavior) > force = verify, failing if root.crt is not present > > and the people who actually want to be "sure they're secure" can set the > "force" value in their environment. > > This is not measurably different in effect from the fact that we have > sslmode defaulting to "prefer" rather than "require". If you want to be > "sure you're secure" you need the latter setting, but I don't believe > there is even remotely a consensus for making that the default. > > BTW, what in the world prompted us to use "cn" as an allowed value for > sslverify? It looks for all the world like a typo for "on".
l1 and 0O where taken? ;-) It would be nice if 'sslverify' mimicked 'sslmode', which has these values: disable allow prefer require I don't see how we could use 'allow', but 'disable', 'prefer', and 'require' seem to work for sslverify, like sslmode. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs