Tom Lane wrote:
> I am of the opinion that sslverify should have these values:
> 
>       off = never verify
>       on = verify if root.crt is present (default behavior)
>       force = verify, failing if root.crt is not present
> 
> and the people who actually want to be "sure they're secure" can set the
> "force" value in their environment.
> 
> This is not measurably different in effect from the fact that we have
> sslmode defaulting to "prefer" rather than "require".  If you want to be
> "sure you're secure" you need the latter setting, but I don't believe
> there is even remotely a consensus for making that the default.
> 
> BTW, what in the world prompted us to use "cn" as an allowed value for
> sslverify?  It looks for all the world like a typo for "on".

l1 and 0O where taken?   ;-)

It would be nice if 'sslverify' mimicked 'sslmode', which has these
values:

        disable
        allow
        prefer
        require

I don't see how we could use 'allow', but 'disable', 'prefer', and
'require' seem to work for sslverify, like sslmode.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to