Guillaume Smet wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Andreas Pflug <pgad...@pse-consulting.de> > wrote: > >> IMHO this should be mentioned in the docs explicitly (I find it quite >> surprising that data can be lost even if the system is shutdown >> correctly), or better when shutting down the postmaster should spit all >> log segments containing all changes when archiving is on so the warm >> standby server can catch up. >> > > See also this thread which might be interesting for you: > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb0903242329j12865d55s348f5c873a956...@mail.gmail.com > It is, though not related to this problem. I'd expect pg_standby's default behaviour to be like the pseudocode's in the warm-standby documentation. To me, it's kind of unexpected that it won't continue restoring if the trigger file is present (as Kevin said, what's the use case for the current behaviour?).
Regards, Andreas -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
