Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Although this qualifies as pilot error (superusers are expected to know >> what they're doing), should we attempt to prevent the case?
> We can't detect binary-incompatibility in general, so I presume you > meant just for the case of composite types. Hmm, I guess we could do it > in that case. Right, I was envisioning "if both types are composite and there's no function supplied, throw error". > I believe the command has been like that for a long time, and this is > the first time someone managed to shoot one's foot. True. Maybe it's not worth the trouble. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs