On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> > 2009/1/10 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >> >> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> >>> Uh, is this ready to be applied? >> >> >> >> I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior. >> > >> > I thing, so this is bug - RETURN QUERY has to supply FOR SELECT LOOP >> > RETURN NEXT pattern. >> > >> > My first patch expected so RETURN QUERY is final statement, so I don't >> > solve FOUND variable, but Heikki changed this behave. >> > >> > Without correct FOUND behave we can't to use RETURN QUERY for following >> > pattern >> > >> > RETURN QUERY some; >> > IF FOUND THEN RETURN; END IF; >> > RETURN QUERY some_other; >> > RETURN; >> >> +1. I can't imagine it's good for this to be randomly inconsistent. > > So should this be applied or just kept for 8.5?
Well, *I* think it should be applied. But YMMV. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
