Zahid Khan <khanzahid...@yahoo.com> writes: >> I might be missing something here, but where do you see the bug? The cursor >> is >> indeed already defined.
> What i understand here is,we should be able to DECLARE cursor again
> with the same name if that is CLOSE already.
No, CLOSE reverses the effect of OPEN, not of DECLARE.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
