Tom Lane schrieb:
> Andreas Peer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>   
>> Well, the use case is a strange one... I would like to use a varchar() 
>> column for storing a variable-length vector of integers. The numbers are 
>> represented by the codepoints. Therefore, I need to sort them as binary 
>> data, not as characters. I would often need to get all the vectors that 
>> lie in between to vectors, therefore I need the "binary" index.
>>     
>
> Use bytea maybe?
>
>   
Than I cannot access the single characters anymore (or I just use bytes,
but that limits a number to 256...)
>> And the code should be as database independent as possible, therefore I 
>> cannot use an array or another data type that may not be supported by 
>> other DBMS.
>>     
>
> I can't imagine how you'd think that a functional index on convert_to()
> would be the most portable solution ...
>   
nearly every DBMS has a function for converting character strings to
binary strings, I would just have to change the function
name/parameters, but the rest of the query could be the same
>                       regards, tom lane
>
>   
Regards,
Andreas Peer

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to