Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> In any case, now that we know that nLocks overflow is actually possible >> within real-world transaction lengths, it'd behoove us to do something >> about that in 8.4 or beyond.
> Is this a TODO?
Yes, although I'm still waiting for more info from Michael.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
