On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 01:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Please provide some more detail about those experiments. The test case
> hasn't been seen to fail in the buildfarm, AFAIR.
Dan Farina, my colleague at Truviso, was experimenting with some query
transformations that pushed the range table entries down into a
subquery.
You can see the effect here:
=> select max(a), generate_series(1,2) as g from foo;
max | g
-----+---
| 1
| 2
(2 rows)
=> -- make "foo" into a subquery and add a no-op
=> -- to prevent it from pulling up the subquery
=> select max(a), generate_series(1,2) as g from (select a as a from foo
offset 0) dummy;
ERROR: set-valued function called in context that cannot accept a set
So, although Dan's transformations were semantically correct, they ended
up causing this regression failure.
It doesn't have anything to do with the ORDER BY, so that part of my
example was unnecessary.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
