Am Thursday, 7. August 2008 schrieb Tom Lane: > I rather wonder whether -L has any reason to live at all. initdb's > default is to locate PGSHAREDIR relative to where it finds the backend > executable, which is consistent with what the backend itself is going > to do. Is there any scenario where specifying a different location > wouldn't be broken?
I think the -L option only exists for legacy reasons. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
