Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, if you think it's easy, the best form of criticism is a patch.
>> The change-of-direction problem seems to me to be messy --- not
>> insoluble, but messy enough to need beta testing.
> Hm, I must have misunderstood the bug because there's a comment in nodeUnique
> which claims it already does precisely what I was suggesting:
> * We return the first tuple from each group of duplicates (or the last
> * tuple of each group, when moving backwards). At either end of the
> * subplan, clear the result slot so that we correctly return the
> * first/last tuple when reversing direction.
That's what it *used* to say. But the problem is that that's the wrong
behavior, because you get different tuples returned depending on which way
you are traveling. It's only workable if the tuples in a group are
completely indistinguishable.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
