Bill Thoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The table seems fine this time, and there was no segfaulting nonsense at 
> any time. But the server log was a lot more active. Whe I loaded this 
> data the first time and had that corruption prroblem, there was hardly 
> anything posted to the log. However, this time I noticed when I ran the 
> postgis script that there was some weirdness written to the log that 
> doesn't look right . Does this look like geos or postgis is a bit broken 
> to you?

No, that's more or less the sort of output I'd expect to see from
loading the postgis datatypes.  There's nothing wrong here that I can
tell.

So, whatever that glitch was, it seems we don't know how to trigger it.
Oh well ...

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to