"Dennis Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> errors test fails. the following is the output. which to me indicates it
> passed but gave different output.
No, it failed. The code in question looks like this:
int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
int32 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
int64 result;
if (arg2 == 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO),
errmsg("division by zero")));
result = arg1 / arg2;
and the output you are showing indicates that the compiler thought it
could rearrange the code so that the division was executed *despite*
the protective test in front of it.
IMHO, what you have here is a compiler bug, or at least the gcc boys are
going to need to provide a damn good excuse why it's not.
BTW, kindly revert the patch you inserted in the Fedora repository.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
