Tom Lane wrote: > And I still find the premise entirely unconvincing. > Maybe the user *wants* to see the local behavior of shift, whatever > it might be. It's certainly not impossible that we'd break applications > that worked fine before (at least on the hardware they were being > used on).
Certainly someone who uses shift operators is more prone to accept architecture-dependent behaviors. Those who like to take a more abstract view can use regular arithmetic. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs