Tom Lane wrote: > I think at the time we set the current minimum -B we were still > intending that you could run in a half meg or so SHMMAX allocation. > That's certainly history. Maybe we should target 2 meg as the rock > bottom minimum?
That makes sense to me. It corresponds to 128 connections under the old arithmetic, which seems reasonable all around. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
