* Tom Lane wrote: > "Christian Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My mistake. I should have been using the heimdal port instead of the >> ancient release in the base system. > > So, how ancient is it? Is there any reason we should try to make > --with-gssapi work with it? It's version 0.6.3, released in September 2004, according to the change log. I don't know whether it would be worth it to make it work, but I doubt it. The FreeBSD port has been using the ports collection's heimdal instead of the base system's at least since 8.0. The reason given in the port is <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-October/018809.html>. > There are good reasons to encourage people to use gssapi only with > recent versions of the underlying libraries, eg > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430983 > so I'm happy to treat this as not-worth-fixing if it really isn't. It isn't for me. -- Christian Ullrich . You will pay for your sins. If you have . already paid, please disregard this message. Registrierter . Linux-User #125183 . ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
