Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane escribió: >> One thing I was wondering about earlier today is whether libxml isn't >> expecting NULL-return-on-failure from the malloc-substitute routine. >> If we take control away from it unexpectedly, I wouldn't be a bit >> surprised if its data structures are left corrupt. This might lead to >> failures during cleanup.
> Hmm, this is a very good point. I quick look at the source shows that > they are not very consistent on its own checking for memory allocation > errors. For example, see a bug I just reported: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=508662 Ugh. So we're pretty much damned if we do and damned if we don't. Given what you showed, it is certain that we are at risk if we return NULL, whereas it is merely hypothetical that we are at risk if we longjmp. So let's stick to the palloc infrastructure for now. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
