On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 14:06 -0500, Scot Loach wrote:
> I agree this would be fine if PostgreSQL works the way you say below.
>
> However, PostgreSQL does not look at the # of bytes written and continue
> sending after that many bytes. PostgreSQL actually simply clears its
> buffer of bytes to send on this error, in this code:
>
> pqcomm.c:1075
> /*
> * We drop the buffered data anyway so that processing can
> * continue, even though we'll probably quit soon.
> */
> PqSendPointer = 0;
> return EOF;
>
>
> The result as I saw on a system where this was occurring, was that when
> PostgreSQL was sending back a large result set, there was simply a
> fragment of it missing.
I think I see what you are saying. I was thinking about fe-misc.c, where
it explicitly says (in the default case of a switch statement of the
return value):
/* We don't assume it's a fatal error... */
conn->outCount = 0;
return -1;
(but that's on the frontend, obviously)
I think the problem you're talking about comes from the callers of
pq_putmessage, which simply ignore any return value at all (and thus do
not retransmit the message). I agree that is a problem (assuming I
understand what's going on).
Regards,
Jeff Davis
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
