On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:47 +0100, Adriaan van Os wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 12:31 +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:32:17PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > >>> ALTER SEQUENCE blah INCREMENT BY val; > >> this has the sideeffect that all concurrent nextvals() will also > >> increment by val, which is not always acceptable. > > > > So this is a feature proposal, not a bug? > > > > Sounds interesting but needs to be on pgsql-hackers, please. > > I posted a message to pgsql-hackers three times but it gets stalled (and the > owner of the list > doesn't reply).
Somebody will need to join pgsql-hackers. Other mail will be reflected because of spam. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
