Simon Riggs escribió: > Sorry to come in on late on this: That wording is better, but it still > doesn't explain why it has occurred or what the user should do about it. > I think we will get other complaints saying "why has my autovacuum been > canceled?" and "what should I do about this?". > > Perhaps it should be > "canceling autovacuum task; will reschedule when user tasks complete" > or > "autovacuum canceled temporarily to allow user task to proceed" > > or something that explains that what has happened is a good thing and > the task that has been canceled will be automatically re-tried.
Perhaps the added phrase could be put in a errdetail() or something like that. The problem is detecting that this is really the case. How would it know that it wasn't user-inflicted? -- Alvaro Herrera Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/ "Las navajas y los monos deben estar siempre distantes" (Germán Poo) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
