By "last patch" you mean
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-10/msg00409.php
?

Sorry for confusion, I meant this one:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-10/msg00217.php

Is it the same as the commited one?

If so that's about as fast as it's likely to get.  22 tables is well
beyond what I'd consider reasonable to run through the exhaustive
planner.  You should try geqo again.

OK, no problem...

Anyway, many thanks for the quick patches!

Kuba

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

              http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to