Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > All of filler fields in branches, tellers and history is NULL. It is > > probabbly a mistake because there are fields of char(22-88) in the table > > definitions. > > TPC-B requires at least 100 bytes per row for all tables used in it. > > I'm not in favor of changing this. pgbench has never pretended to be > "really" TPC-B, nor has anyone ever tried to compare its numbers against > other TPC-B numbers. On the other hand, people *do* compare pgbench > numbers to itself over time, and if we make a change like this it will > break comparability of the results.
Ok, I feel it reasonable. The attached is a patch to mention it in the source code. Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center
pgbench-tpcb.patch
Description: Binary data
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
