Hi, Neil Conway [2007-09-17 10:16 -0700]: > At a minimum, I think we could make the fact that the transaction > has been rolled back more obvious (e.g. echo a ROLLBACK command tag > to the output or a similar warning message). Asking for confirmation > might be too chatty, and it's certainly not possible in > non-interactive mode.
Unless you do isatty(STDIN_FILENO). Nothing should change for noninteractive mode. However, I agree that it might be annoying. If you just output a rollback command on exit, then it is already too late to rescue the pending transaction, so I'm not sure whether that would help this use case so much. What do you think about displaying a different prompt when a transaction is pending, like showing the number of open transactions in parentheses or so? '(2 transactions pending) mydb$' is way too long, and '(T2) mydb$' is not intuitive. Hmm.. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
