Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > 2. decide that the standard is braindead and just omit dumping the > > grantor when it's no longer available, but don't remove > > pg_auth_members.grantor > > > > Which do people feel should be implemented? I can do whatever we > > decide; if no one has a strong opinion on the matter, my opinion is we > > do (2) which is the easiest. > > Here is a patch implementing this idea, vaguely based on Russell's.
Applied to CVS HEAD, 8.2 and 8.1. If we want to start tracking the grantor as a shared dependency, and have REVOKE work per spec (i.e. only revoke the privileges actually granted by the role executing REVOKE), those are separate patches (and they should be applied only to HEAD). This patch merely fixes the fact that pg_dumpall failed to work for busted databases. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
