David Fetter wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:07:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > At some point, we will find something where we will have to duplicate > > > some large hunk of 5.8's functionality to support 5.6. > > > > No, we won't; we are not in the business of fixing Perl bugs. > > My point exactly. > > > You haven't given any reason why someone who is using 5.6 and is > > happy with it shouldn't be able to continue to use it with PG. > > In my experience, people aren't "happy with" 5.6. Instead, they've > got a mandate to maintain support for it, and this could be an > argument for upgrading.
Or an argument to dump PostgreSQL. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
