On 10/10/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Milen A. Radev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/10/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I couldn't duplicate any such leak using your test program here.
> The client and the server were on different machines - that's why I
> believe "md5" was used. I'm sending only the client machine's
> pg_config output. Tell me if you need the server's too.
I cannot duplicate a leak using a cross-machine connection with md5
auth, either. I tested this using Fedora Core 5 and the current FC5
libpq (postgresql-libs-8.1.4-1.FC5.1 RPM).
I'm wondering if the leak you see is actually the fault of the glibc
version on your machine.
You're most probably right - I could reproduce this results only with
libc6 2.3.x (Slackware 9.1, Debian stable), but not with version 2.4
(FC5).
--
Milen A. Radev
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
