Massimo Fidanza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I can join the translation team and translate the missing strigs,=20=
> =20
> but I think this is not the right answer. I think the best solution is=20=
> =20
> to accept the english answer too.
I liked Peter's idea better (ie, not have the y/n in the
string-to-be-translated but generate it dynamically using the same
strings that will actually be matched to the input). Your approach
fails if there are any languages that use y or n in a way conflicting
with the English usage ... and whether or not we have any such
translations today, who knows what will be out there tomorrow?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
