"John Rylander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When for some reason I did a sum/count instead of an avg, the result was
> always an integer (either 0 or 1):
What's your point? Postgres has always defined division of integers as
yielding an integer result. AFAICS this choice is fully sanctioned by
the SQL standard:
1) If the data type of both operands of a dyadic arithmetic opera-
tor is exact numeric, then the data type of the result is exact
numeric, with precision and scale determined as follows:
...
d) The precision and scale of the result of division is
implementation-defined.
(SQL92 6.12 <numeric value expression> syntax rule 1)
> Yet another maddening PostgreSQL bug/idiosyncrasy. Time for this boy to go
> to Oracle
Sayonara. Last I checked, they had a few idiosyncrasies too.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
