Tom Lane wrote: > Allowing SIGPIPE to kill the backend is completely infeasible, as the > backend would be unable to release locks etc before dying.
So the upshot is really not that ignoring SIGPIPE is specifically intended as the optimal solution but that writing a proper cleanup handler for SIGPIPE seems very difficult. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
