The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2336
Logged by: Chris Mair
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.3
Operating system: MacOS X 10.3.9
Description: will not drop implicitly created sequence
Details:
Ok, so this is probably not a bug at all - just slightly unexpected
behaviour.
This piece of SQL:
---------------------------------------------------
create table test2 (id serial, txt varchar);
-- (will create implicit sequence "test2_id_seq")
alter table test2 alter id set default 123;
drop sequence test2_id_seq;
---------------------------------------------------
would say:
---------------------------------------------------
ERROR: 2BP01: cannot drop sequence test2_id_seq because table test2 column
id requires it
HINT: You may drop table test2 column id instead.
LOCATION: recursiveDeletion, dependency.c:472
---------------------------------------------------
as if test2.id would still use the sequence.
Contrast this with the same thing done with an explicitly declared
sequence:
---------------------------------------------------
create sequence test1_id_seq;
create table test1 (id int not null default nextval('test1_id_seq'), txt
varchar);
alter table test1 alter id set default 123;
drop sequence test1_id_seq;
---------------------------------------------------
which will just work fine.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
