When grilled further on (Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:26:02 -0500), Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confessed:
> > We need to change the function APIs so that date2isoweek passes back > some indication of which year it thought the week belongs to, and then > isoweek2date must use that instead of the original year number. > > Each of these functions is used in several places, so the change is not > quite trivial, but still not a big deal. Who wants to fix it? > I'll take a look at it next weekend (4/2 or 4/3) if it's still not done. Cheers, Rob -- 20:43:32 up 14:07, 9 users, load average: 3.15, 2.76, 2.00 Linux 2.6.5-02 #8 SMP Mon Jul 12 21:34:44 MDT 2004
pgpDal9vowsW1.pgp
Description: PGP signature