When grilled further on (Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:26:02 -0500),
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confessed:

> 
> We need to change the function APIs so that date2isoweek passes back
> some indication of which year it thought the week belongs to, and then
> isoweek2date must use that instead of the original year number.
> 
> Each of these functions is used in several places, so the change is not
> quite trivial, but still not a big deal.  Who wants to fix it?
> 

I'll take a look at it next weekend (4/2 or 4/3) if it's still not done.

Cheers,
Rob

-- 
 20:43:32 up 14:07,  9 users,  load average: 3.15, 2.76, 2.00
Linux 2.6.5-02 #8 SMP Mon Jul 12 21:34:44 MDT 2004

Attachment: pgpDal9vowsW1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to