Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I am wondering why we allow the 'interval' data type specification to be
> after the string.

Because that's what the standard demands.  Please don't muddy the waters
by introducing yet more nonstandard syntax into the discussion.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to