On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:01:29 +0000, andrzej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 1408 > Logged by: andrzej > Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PostgreSQL version: 8.0.0-rc5 > Operating system: windows XP > Description: don't see index > Details: > > Create table t1 > ( > v varchar(5) not null, > m varchar(20), > d date, > l varchar(10), > primary key(v) > ); > > explain select * from t1 where v='abc' > result: > Seq Scan on t1 (.... > Filter:((v)::text='abc'::text) > DON'T SEE INDEX PKEY ???????!!!! > > but Postgres 7.4.2 Linux > explain select * from t1 where v='abc' > result: > Index Scan using t1_pkey on t1(... > Index Cond((v)::text='abc'::text) > SEE INDEX PKEY OK !!!!!
This probably isn't a bug. In some circumstances a sequential scan is faster than an index scan. How many rows are in this table? Have you run an ANALYZE on the table? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster