Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 12:25:31AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A related point is that ALTER TABLE ... OWNER does not recurse to
>> the table's indexes.
> Eh? ALTER TABLE ... OWNER won't touch the indexes if the table
> owner doesn't change, but if the table owner changes then so do
> the index owners.
[ scratches head ... ] Looking at the code, you're right. I'm not sure
what I did wrong in the quick test that led me to conclude otherwise.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
