Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As much as I would like the URERLIMIT hacks removed for 8.0 I am thinking > we are too far along in release and don't have enough time to figure out > how to do the security definer function cleanly.
What does that have to do with it? We aren't the ones who would be writing such a function. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster