Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As much as I would like the URERLIMIT hacks removed for 8.0 I am thinking
> we are too far along in release and don't have enough time to figure out
> how to do the security definer function cleanly.

What does that have to do with it?  We aren't the ones who would be
writing such a function.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to