But shouldn't it wrap when it hits the max?
Assuming wrapping is an OK behavior, not setting
a proper max will eliminate that option for overflow.
--elein
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 08:30:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> elein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In both cases sequences are created as int8 values with
> > a maximum of 9223372036854775807.
>
> > BUG: The assignment of the table containing the int4 column
> > will overflow at 2147483648 (max integer size).
>
> I don't think this is really a problem.
>
> You are going to have errors when you run out of int4-sized identifiers
> in either case. If we reduce the sequence's maximum, that just means
> one more thing you'll have to fix in order to recover.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
