Marc Boucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > CREATE OR REPLACE RULE albed_updalb3_rl AS > ON UPDATE TO album WHERE new.pls_id != old.pls_id > DO > UPDATE album_edit SET pls_id=new.pls_id WHERE alb_id=new.id;
> It works until new.pls_id or old.pls_id is null. The rule is still called > (based on my test), but the "DO" query is not executed correctly. That's not a bug. "foo != NULL" does not yield true, it yields NULL. You could test for nulls with IS NULL, or possibly use the IS DISTINCT FROM construct (does 7.3 have that? I forget.) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html