I understand very well your answer, however, I would like to introduce 
briefly our needs and why we decided to use the "-r no_indicator" with ECPG.

We are porting a Pro*C/Oracle 7.3.4 based application (about 4000 SQL 
requests) to ECPG/PostGreSQL 7.4.2.
This application mostly uses VARCHAR variables, considering (with Oracle)
any 
uninitialised varchar (NULL value) as an empty string.
If we don't use the "-r no_indicator" option with ECPG, requests containing 
at least one NULL value return an "ECPG_MISSING_INDICATOR" error code.
This is normal as they don't contain "null indicator" variables in their 
Oracle version.

The "-r no_indicator" option, which considers NULL VARCHARs as empty 
VARCHARs, seems to corresponds to the application needs.
However, if this mechanism doesn't guarantee the length field to be coherent

with the returned strings, we'll have to test the string length with :
        strlen(myVarchar.arr)
instead of simply reading
        myVarchar.len

Is there another way to get "real" empty varchars (with a correct length 
associated !) instead of NULL VARCHAR values ?

However, having a positive length associated with an empty VARCHAR still 
seems incoherent to me...

Thanks a lot

Regards

Caroline Hebert

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Michael Meskes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoye : lundi 21 juin 2004 11:13
A : Hebert, Caroline
Cc : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Objet : Re: [BUGS] ECPG doesn't return the correct length for an empty


On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 08:18:07AM +0100, Hebert, Caroline wrote:
>   Short Description : ECPG doesn't return the correct length for an empty 
> VARCHAR

I'm sorry, but this is not a bug but an incorrectly used feature.

> I compiled with :
> * /usr/local/pgsql/bin/ecpg -r no_indicator pg_empty_varchar.pgc

When using "-r no_indicator" an empty string in a varchar is considered
a NULL value.  So you essantially put a NULL value in the database and
then read it and try to use it as if it was not NULL. 

If you remove this option it works fine.

As an explanation, this option came in as a compatibility option to
Informix. But it can also be used without Informix as you see. I wonder
if I should make this option only callable in compatibility mode.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to